Compensation for Travel Time
Compensation for Travel Time
The recent case of Overton v. Disney (No.
B179854, CA Court of Appeals) deals with the issue of whether an
employee should be compensated for his or her time travelling to
and from work.
- Bobby Overton, an employee of Disney, claimed that Disney
should compensate its employees for the time taken to travel on the
shuttle from the parking lot to the main entrance of Disneyland
(where the employees would punch in).
- Overton contended that because employees were required to take
the shuttle by Disney, they should be compensated for their time
travelling on the shuttle.
The Law
- Employees must be compensated for their "hours worked". "Hours
worked" is the time when an employee is subject to the control of
the employer and includes all time the employee is "suffered or
permitted to work".
Court's Analysis
- Here, the issue was whether Overton and the other Disney
employees were subject to the control of Disney while they were
taking the shuttle to work. In other words, were the employees
required by Disney to take the shuttle?
- The Court observed that while 90% of Disney employees did drive
to work and take the shuttle, they were by no means forced to take
the shuttle. In fact, 10% of Disney employees took vanpools, were
driven by friends or family, arrived in buses or trains, or came by
some other means of transportation.
- Unlike the case of Morillion v. Royal Packing
Co., in which farmworkers were forced to meet in the
parking lot and take the shuttle to the fields in which they
worked, the Disney employees in Overton were not
forced by Disney to take the shuttle to work.
Conclusion
- If your employer is forcing you to travel to work in
employer-controlled transportation and not compensating you for
that time, please call our office for a consultation.
|